IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Clarkson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 47 8 17 25 0.532 0.1304 0.1322 0.3641 0.3690
2002-03 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 38 21 18 39 1.026 0.2515 0.2445 0.7025 0.6829
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Hamilton D3 — JR 21 5 13 18 0.857
2004-05 Hamilton D3 — SO 22 5 14 19 0.864
2003-04 Hamilton D3 — FR 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2003-04 · Hamilton
+112.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21471
Forward overall
#614
Forward born in 1984
#913
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.