← New Search ↗ Social Card

Arseni Marchenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-10 Country: Belarus
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 52 3 3 6 0.115 0.0681 0.0693 0.3463 0.3523
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 59 2 9 11 0.186 0.1100 0.1066 0.5593 0.5420
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17906
Defenseman overall
#3051
Defenseman born in 2006
#4098
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.12
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.