← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Schneidmiller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1218 0.1250 0.2964 0.3041
2018-19 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 53 7 21 28 0.528 0.1343 0.1287 0.2192 0.2100
2019-20 NOJHL 13 1 9 10 0.769 0.1956 0.1956 0.3191 0.3191
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 25 6 8 14 0.560
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 25 6 8 14 0.560
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 25 6 8 14 0.560
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 25 6 8 14 0.560
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 25 6 8 14 0.560
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 25 6 8 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2020-21 · Niagara
+366.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8787
Defenseman overall
#1791
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2003-04
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.