IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Schneidmiller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1025 0.1052 0.3012 0.3090
2018-19 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 53 7 21 28 0.528 0.0900 0.0862 0.2239 0.2145
2019-20 — NOJHL 13 1 9 10 0.769 0.1310 0.1310 0.3260 0.3260
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 25 6 8 14 0.560
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 25 6 8 14 0.560
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 25 6 8 14 0.560
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 25 6 8 14 0.560
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 25 6 8 14 0.560
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA — 25 6 8 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2020-21 · Niagara
+532.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9901
Defenseman overall
#1930
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Schultz
Elmira · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex O'Dowd
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Curry · 2016-17
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.