IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abe Barnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-21 Country: USA
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 57 2 6 8 0.140 0.1044 0.1093 0.5239 0.5483
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 63 1 10 11 0.175 0.1298 0.1287 0.6515 0.6461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15341
Defenseman overall
#849
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Boka
USHL 2014-15
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Luke Martin
USHL 2015-16
0.20
actual FR PPG at Michigan
David Gucciardi
USHL 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Hunter Hady
USHL 2021-22
0.03
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Suede
Adrian · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Nyman
Hamline · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.