← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Vig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-27 Country: USA
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 USNTDP Juniors USHL 30 3 1 4 0.133 0.0786 0.0818 0.4004 0.4167
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 11 21 32 0.542 0.3200 0.3176 1.6290 1.6166
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29147
Forward overall
#1007
Forward born in 2007
#2745
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
SHL-J20 2022-23
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.