← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooks Cullen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-13 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Moorhead USHS-MN 30 2 7 9 0.300 0.0380 0.0380 0.0729 0.0729
2023-24 Moorhead USHS-MN 27 15 6 21 0.778 0.0985 0.0985 0.1889 0.1889
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.1180 0.1201 0.6007 0.6114
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 62 6 17 23 0.371 0.2189 0.2122 1.1143 1.0804
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22469
Forward overall
#1021
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.15
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2012-13
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2003-04
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.