| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Edina | USHS-MN | 20 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.350 | 0.0443 | 0.0443 | 0.0850 | 0.0850 |
| 2021-22 | Edina | USHS-MN | 31 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.710 | 0.0898 | 0.0898 | 0.1724 | 0.1724 |
| 2022-23 | Edina | USHS-MN | 29 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 1.379 | 0.1746 | 0.1746 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.0737 | 0.0746 | 0.3754 | 0.3800 |
| 2024-25 | Madison Capitols | USHL | 45 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.333 | 0.1966 | 0.1890 | 1.0010 | 0.9623 |
| 2025-26 | Madison Capitols | USHL | 54 | 8 | 18 | 26 | 0.481 | 0.2840 | 0.2593 | 1.4461 | 1.3203 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.