IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Lowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 10 38 48 0.814 0.1765 0.1813 0.6293 0.6463
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 60 24 53 77 1.283 0.2783 0.2720 0.9926 0.9703
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 10 15 25 0.833
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 6 23 29 1.036
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 27 5 10 15 0.556
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 18 2 6 8 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2011-12 · Adrian
+120.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12170
Forward overall
#476
Forward born in 1991
#126
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2005-06
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.