IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Drury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-24 Country: USA
Colby
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brunswick NE-Prep 27 5 7 12 0.444 0.0880 0.0880 0.2025 0.2025
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 29 4 4 8 0.276 0.0547 0.0547 0.1257 0.1257
2023-24 Brunswick NE-Prep 33 5 5 10 0.303 0.0600 0.0600 0.1380 0.1380
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 15 1 0 1 0.067 0.0393 0.0374 0.2003 0.1908
2025-26 Northeast Generals NAHL 54 5 4 9 0.167 0.0612 0.0580 0.1760 0.1667
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53844
Forward overall
#3733
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

Colby Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matt Strickland
0.48
actual FR PPG at Colby
Michael DeBello
0.20
actual FR PPG at Colby
Cam Russo
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colby
James Tepper
0.17
actual FR PPG at Colby

D2/3 Comparables

McKenzie Gray
Neumann · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmett McHardy
Castleton · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Grady Friedman
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.