IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James O'Reilly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nepean Raiders CCHL 13 0 4 4 0.308 0.0667 0.0642 0.2357 0.2268
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 26 3 15 18 0.692
2013-14 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 25 4 16 20 0.800
2012-13 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 23 10 3 13 0.565
2011-12 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 9 2 0 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2011-12 · New England College
+304.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47781
Forward overall
#1717
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

J.T. Walters
Bethel · 2013-14
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Jordan
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Henegar
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.