← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Jakusz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 32 10 28 38 1.188 0.1339 0.1339 0.4040 0.4040
2021-22 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0549 0.0545 0.1588 0.1577
2022-23 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 12 19 31 0.705 0.0795 0.0747 0.2397 0.2253
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 19 2 3 5 0.263
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 21 1 6 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Lawrence
+429.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6142
Defenseman overall
#1535
Defenseman born in 2002
#2032
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2004-05
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.