IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu Fehr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 34 12 3 15 0.441 0.1409 0.1423 0.3415 0.3448
2023-24 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 55 9 13 22 0.400 0.1277 0.1221 0.3096 0.2961
2024-25 — CCHL 52 13 13 26 0.500 0.1596 0.1454 0.3871 0.3527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 24 5 4 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Nazareth
+221.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38097
Forward overall
#2399
Forward born in 2004
#1206
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lane Boswell
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Rock
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Derlago
Utica · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.