IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Bienstock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-05-22 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 56 4 10 14 0.250 0.1475 0.1555 0.7502 0.7907
2026-27 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10597
Defenseman overall
#687
Defenseman born in 2008
#3515
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Iivari Räsänen
SM-Liiga-Jr 2019-20
0.32
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Nicky Wallace
USHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Jan Golicic
QMJHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Karlis Cukste
USHL 2015-16
0.39
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.