IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mighton Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 27 1 1 2 0.074 0.0161 0.0165 0.0574 0.0588
2023-24 — MJHL 43 4 6 10 0.233 0.0448 0.0438 0.1466 0.1434
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE — 21 3 1 4 0.191
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE — 19 2 0 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · Wentworth
+274.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#58027
Forward overall
#4174
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Critter Nagurski
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Ray
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Isaac Barrett
Utica · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.