IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Celli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 39 8 9 17 0.436 0.1309 0.1288 0.2984 0.2936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 27 14 13 27 1.000
2014-15 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 26 12 11 23 0.885
2013-14 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 26 12 12 24 0.923
2012-13 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 26 11 16 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2012-13 · Fitchburg State
+841.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40274
Forward overall
#1404
Forward born in 1991
#3102
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Prost
Western New England · 2008-09
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Costello
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.