← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bexson Fox Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-10 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Western New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1281 0.1390 0.3769 0.4090
2024-25 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 40 5 3 8 0.200 0.0512 0.0528 0.1508 0.1556
2025-26 Warman Wolverines SJHL 52 2 4 6 0.115 0.0296 0.0290 0.0870 0.0852
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#58607
Forward overall
#4053
Forward born in 2006
#2256
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.30
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.20
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.24
actual FR PPG at Western New England
0.08
actual FR PPG at Western New England

D2/3 Comparables

Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.