IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kody Vaisanen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Markham Waxers OJHL 36 3 11 14 0.389 0.0953 0.0956 0.2677 0.2686
2009-10 North York Rangers OJHL 49 10 14 24 0.490 0.1200 0.1141 0.3371 0.3205
2010-11 North York Rangers OJHL 44 8 18 26 0.591 0.1448 0.1309 0.4067 0.3678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 1 4 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+88.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36580
Forward overall
#1303
Forward born in 1990
#2201
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Humphreys
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Borowiec
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Kulas
Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.