| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Streetsville Derbys (OLD) | OJHL | 44 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.250 | 0.0751 | 0.0768 | 0.1711 | 0.1749 |
| 2010-11 | Caledon Admirals | OJHL | 48 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.438 | 0.1314 | 0.1282 | 0.2995 | 0.2922 |
| 2011-12 | Trenton Golden Hawks | OJHL | 47 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 0.681 | 0.2045 | 0.1905 | 0.4661 | 0.4341 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SR | 27 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 0.481 |
| 2014-15 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | JR | 20 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.500 |
| 2013-14 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.560 |
| 2012-13 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | FR | 20 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.250 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.