IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Scantlebury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-15 Country: Canada
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 62 16 23 39 0.629 0.3710 0.4031 1.8891 2.0527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9920
Forward overall
#23
Forward born in 2009
#832
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Poganski
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schmaltz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Hitchcock
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dylan Peterson
NTDP-U18 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Tyler Boucher
NTDP-U18 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Devin Kaplan
USHL 2020-21
0.57
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Robert Mastrosimone
USHL 2017-18
0.50
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.