IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Scantlebury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-15 Country: Canada
Top 42 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 62 16 23 39 0.629 0.3710 0.4031 1.8874 2.0508
2026-27 Québec Remparts QMJHL 6 6 3 9 1.500 0.7369 0.7369 4.0044 4.0044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10118
Forward overall
#42
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Anthony Louis
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brendan Harms
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Diamantoni
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Compher
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Michigan (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tyler Boucher
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Robert Mastrosimone
USHL 2018-19
0.50
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Jake Wise
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Joel Farabee
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.97
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.