IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chad Cummings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Brampton Capitals OJHL 43 4 7 11 0.256 0.0627 0.0667 0.1751 0.1863
2009-10 Brampton Capitals OJHL 53 3 17 20 0.377 0.0925 0.0936 0.2583 0.2613
2010-11 Villanova Knights OJHL 47 3 6 9 0.192 0.0469 0.0453 0.1311 0.1265
2011-12 — OJHL 43 3 9 12 0.279 0.0684 0.0630 0.1910 0.1759
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 26 5 12 17 0.654
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 23 0 2 2 0.087
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 21 1 2 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+170.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19938
Defenseman overall
#1826
Defenseman born in 1991
#3860
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Kelly
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Stendahl
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2004-05
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Mott
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.