IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Cover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-19 Country: USA
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 60 11 12 23 0.383 0.2261 0.2486 1.1512 1.2657
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23266
Forward overall
#89
Forward born in 2009
#2268
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Liam Pecararo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Joshua
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Milan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Hitchcock
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Geno McEnery
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
Tomas Mazura
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Providence
Braiden Clark
USHL 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Providence
Chase Yoder
NTDP-U18 2018-19
0.24
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Janke
Norwich · 2005-06
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jax Murray
Trinity · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.