IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Sagadin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-30 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Luleå HF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SuperElit 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0493 0.0537 0.1722 0.1875
2022-23 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SHL-J20 39 4 10 14 0.359 0.1994 0.2075 0.4779 0.4972
2023-24 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SuperElit 44 8 9 17 0.386 0.1525 0.1512 0.5323 0.5278
2024-25 Luleå HF U20 SuperElit 50 19 30 49 0.980 0.3867 0.3640 1.3501 1.2707
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 61 11 12 23 0.377 0.2224 0.1994 1.1313 1.0144
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Bentley D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11354
Forward overall
#515
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.