IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Wadsworth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 35 1 8 9 0.257 0.0630 0.0614 0.1760 0.1714
2011-12 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 48 1 13 14 0.292 0.0715 0.0665 0.1997 0.1857
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2013-14 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 20 1 0 1 0.050
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#19743
Defenseman overall
#1818
Defenseman born in 1991
#3832
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Vichorek
Hamline · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johannes Tammeorg
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Anna
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.