| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Newmarket Hurricanes | OJHL | 50 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.280 | 0.0782 | 0.0802 | 0.1932 | 0.1981 |
| 2011-12 | Newmarket Hurricanes | OJHL | 48 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.458 | 0.1280 | 0.1256 | 0.3163 | 0.3103 |
| 2012-13 | Newmarket Hurricanes | OJHL | 47 | 6 | 19 | 25 | 0.532 | 0.1486 | 0.1384 | 0.3671 | 0.3419 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | SR | 25 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 1.320 |
| 2015-16 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 24 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.583 |
| 2014-15 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 24 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 0.958 |
| 2013-14 | Morrisville | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 24 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 0.750 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.