← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Santino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 4 10 14 0.280 0.0782 0.0802 0.1932 0.1981
2011-12 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 48 13 9 22 0.458 0.1280 0.1256 0.3163 0.3103
2012-13 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 47 6 19 25 0.532 0.1486 0.1384 0.3671 0.3419
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 15 18 33 1.320
2015-16 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 24 4 10 14 0.583
2014-15 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 24 11 12 23 0.958
2013-14 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 24 5 13 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2013-14 · Morrisville
+557.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32226
Forward overall
#1362
Forward born in 1992
#2979
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.