← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Perl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-09-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Villanova Knights OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 50 3 12 15 0.300 0.0838 0.0899 0.2070 0.2221
2010-11 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 50 2 6 8 0.160 0.0447 0.0459 0.1104 0.1133
2011-12 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 48 2 9 11 0.229 0.0640 0.0629 0.1582 0.1554
2012-13 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 4 13 17 0.327 0.0913 0.0851 0.2256 0.2104
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 5 16 21 0.778
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA JR 28 2 4 6 0.214
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 2 5 7 0.269
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2013-14 · Marian
+620.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16780
Defenseman overall
#1838
Defenseman born in 1992
#4581
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.