← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Greeder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-12-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 29 4 12 16 0.552 0.0698 0.0698 0.1340 0.1340
2023-24 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 26 6 15 21 0.808 0.1023 0.1023 0.1962 0.1962
2024-25 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 26 14 29 43 1.654 0.2094 0.2094 0.4017 0.4017
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 58 5 9 14 0.241 0.1424 0.1397 0.7250 0.7113
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4293
Defenseman overall
#907
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.03
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2015-16
0.26
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2016-17
0.17
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.