← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darik Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-03 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Duluth Marshall USHS-MN 18 2 6 8 0.444 0.0563 0.0563 0.1079 0.1079
2021-22 Duluth Marshall USHS-MN 24 3 9 12 0.500 0.0633 0.0633 0.1215 0.1215
2024-25 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 32 8 5 13 0.406 0.2396 0.2279 1.2200 1.1606
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6087
Defenseman overall
#1293
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHL 2017-18
0.35
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.