← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-19 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kent School NE-Prep 28 5 8 13 0.464 0.0920 0.0920 0.2115 0.2115
2024-25 Kent School NE-Prep 26 5 13 18 0.692 0.1371 0.1371 0.3154 0.3154
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 51 4 6 10 0.196 0.1157 0.1238 0.5890 0.6305
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.