IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Suvak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 King Rebellion OJHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0409 0.0399 0.1146 0.1118
2012-13 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 18 2 11 13 0.722 0.1028 0.0964 0.3007 0.2819
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2015-16 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 21 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2013-14 · Westfield State
+330.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21193
Defenseman overall
#2007
Defenseman born in 1992
#4030
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Singleton
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Blake
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jameson Lundquist
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.