IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Eardley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 47 7 7 14 0.298 0.0646 0.0667 0.2306 0.2381
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 13 1 0 1 0.077
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2014-15 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 15 2 3 5 0.333
2013-14 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 19 1 2 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2013-14 · Lawrence
+176.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47664
Forward overall
#1949
Forward born in 1994
#1445
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brodie Jamieson
Marian · 2010-11
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Dillon
Bowdoin · 2003-04
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.