IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Chicago Steel USHL 26 3 7 10 0.385 0.2364 0.2316 1.1331 1.1103
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Lebanon Valley D3 — SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Lebanon Valley D3 — JR 11 3 2 5 0.455
2006-07 Lebanon Valley D3 — SO 21 2 2 4 0.191
2006-07 St. Thomas D3 — SR 26 16 25 41 1.577
2005-06 Lebanon Valley D3 — FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2005-06 St. Thomas D3 — JR 27 13 25 38 1.407
2004-05 St. Thomas D3 — SO 26 15 15 30 1.154
2003-04 St. Thomas D3 — FR 27 9 6 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2003-04 · St. Thomas
+180.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22899
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1983
#2277
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2012-13
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.