← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Strom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-11 Country: USA
Ohio State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 36 2 6 8 0.222 0.1311 0.1358 0.6668 0.6908
2026-27 Chicago Steel USHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39812
Forward overall
#782
Forward born in 2008
#3706
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

Ohio State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at Ohio State
USHL 2016-17
0.76
actual FR PPG at Ohio State

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.