IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Chmiel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-29 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 48 1 4 5 0.104 0.0615 0.0641 0.3130 0.3263
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23369
Defenseman overall
#1209
Defenseman born in 2008
#4110
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Hamilton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Savage
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Austin Zemlak
WHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Tucker Ness
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Jackson Niedermayer
BCHL 2018-19
0.16
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Sam Court
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.31
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2013-14
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Schreiner
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.