← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-04-02 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 28 2 14 16 0.571 0.0723 0.0723 0.1387 0.1387
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 53 1 10 11 0.207 0.1542 0.1570 0.7781 0.7923
2026-27 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.1062 0.1062 0.5358 0.5358
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13886
Defenseman overall
#248
Defenseman born in 2009

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.03
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2012-13
0.47
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2021-22
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.