IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-04-02 Country: USA
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Hill-Murray USHS-MN 28 2 14 16 0.571 0.0723 0.0723 0.1388 0.1388
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 53 1 10 11 0.207 0.1542 0.1570 0.7743 0.7884
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13704
Defenseman overall
#202
Defenseman born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Ryan Collins
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Billitier
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

EJ Emery
NTDP-U18 2022-23
0.03
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Matt Kiersted
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.28
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Andrew Peski
CCHL 2013-14
0.10
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
Jonny Tychonick
BCHL 2016-17
0.14
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Callen
Fitchburg State · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2000-01
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Declan House
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.