IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Power Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 50 9 6 15 0.300 0.0651 0.0671 0.2322 0.2392
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 62 14 48 62 1.000 0.2169 0.2126 0.7741 0.7588
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 24 3 9 12 0.500
2016-17 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 25 5 7 12 0.480
2015-16 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 26 7 11 18 0.692
2014-15 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2014-15 · Nazareth
+142.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24107
Forward overall
#940
Forward born in 1994
#494
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Artem Buzoberya
Hobart · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Facchini
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.