← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Covelluzzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-30 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 25 18 13 31 1.240 0.2494 0.2494 0.5671 0.5671
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 16 2 1 3 0.188 0.1106 0.1204 0.5626 0.6125
2026-27 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.2360 0.2360 1.2003 1.2003
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27819
Forward overall
#145
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2018-19
0.21
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Maine
SHL-J20 2015-16
0.38
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.