IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Covelluzzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-30 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 25 18 13 31 1.240 0.2456 0.2456 0.5649 0.5649
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 16 2 1 3 0.188 0.1106 0.1204 0.5631 0.6130
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27397
Forward overall
#113
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Adam Dawe
SJHL 2015-16
0.41
actual FR PPG at Maine
Miguel Marques
WHL 2022-23
0.70
actual FR PPG at Maine
Jaden Lipinski
WHL 2021-22
0.40
actual FR PPG at Maine
Liam Pecararo
USHL 2012-13
0.36
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Scott
Williams · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.