IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Echelmeier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 North Bay Trappers NOJHL 27 2 7 9 0.333 0.0557 0.0539 0.1388 0.1344
2013-14 Espanola Rivermen NOJHL 31 0 9 9 0.290 0.0485 0.0447 0.1209 0.1113
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2015-16 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 26 0 7 7 0.269
2014-15 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 24 2 3 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2014-15 · UMass Dartmouth
+355.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21670
Defenseman overall
#2009
Defenseman born in 1993
#1321
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Beacom
Bethel · 2023-24
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathias Åhman
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Dekorte
Lake Forest · 2013-14
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.