IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Henderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 57 14 13 27 0.474 0.1340 0.1393 0.2985 0.3102
2009-10 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 58 5 13 18 0.310 0.0878 0.0873 0.1955 0.1944
2010-11 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 49 15 29 44 0.898 0.2540 0.2403 0.5658 0.5352
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Western New England D3 — SR 21 8 7 15 0.714
2004-05 Western New England D3 — JR 18 7 14 21 1.167
2003-04 Western New England D3 — SO 25 10 10 20 0.800
2002-03 Western New England D3 — FR 17 6 7 13 0.765

NCAAe Rankings

#23829
Forward overall
#997
Forward born in 1990
#710
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinn Fuchs
Concordia · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake McKenelly
Wentworth · 2017-18
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Valenti
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.