| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Swan Valley Stampeders | MJHL | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.1925 | 0.2141 | 0.6302 | 0.7009 |
| 2010-11 | Swan Valley Stampeders | MJHL | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | — | MJHL | 50 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.060 | 0.0115 | 0.0117 | 0.0378 | 0.0383 |
| 2012-13 | Winkler Flyers | MJHL | 11 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.273 | 0.0525 | 0.0506 | 0.1719 | 0.1656 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Colby | D3 | — | SR | 23 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.435 |
| 2006-07 | Colby | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.440 |
| 2005-06 | Colby | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.240 |
| 2004-05 | Colby | D3 | — | FR | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.