← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Heleno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-07-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Toronto Patriots OJHL 28 0 3 3 0.107 0.0263 0.0269 0.0733 0.0751
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 3 9 12 0.240 0.0588 0.0573 0.1643 0.1601
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 51 9 9 18 0.353 0.0865 0.0799 0.2416 0.2231
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Salem State D1 SR 28 2 4 6 0.214
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 28 2 4 6 0.214
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 27 2 2 4 0.148
2016-17 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 27 0 3 3 0.111
2015-16 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 28 0 11 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · Salem State
+487.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20636
Defenseman overall
#1940
Defenseman born in 1993
#3953
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2018-19
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.