IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luca Cannata Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-21 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2026-27 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0641 0.1762 0.1846
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Andy Earl
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Shane LaVelle
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Brady McIsaac
BCHL 2023-24
0.24
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Andy Willis
NAHL 2016-17
0.88
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Way
Concordia · 2016-17
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braeden McKenzie
Assumption · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Williams
Daniel Webster · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.