IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caiden Pellegrino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-10 Country: USA
Top 13 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 St. Marks NE-Prep 29 11 30 41 1.414 0.2843 0.2843 0.6465 0.6465
2025-26 St. Marks NE-Prep 30 29 41 70 2.333 0.4692 0.4692 — —
2026-27 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 7 3 6 9 1.286 0.6317 0.6317 3.4323 3.4323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4677
Forward overall
#13
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Anthony Louis
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Miami (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Vinni Lettieri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Diamantoni
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Moore
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Blake Zielinski
USHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
Patrick Moynihan
NTDP-U18 2018-19
0.62
actual FR PPG at Providence
Logan Sawyer
AJHL 2023-24
0.43
actual FR PPG at Providence
Roger McQueen
WHL 2024-25
0.75
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.