IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caiden Pellegrino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-10 Country: USA
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 St. Marks NE-Prep 29 11 30 41 1.414 0.2801 0.2801 0.6441 0.6441
2025-26 St. Marks NE-Prep 30 29 41 70 2.333 0.4622 0.4622 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4583
Forward overall
#5
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Albin Nilsson
SHL-J20 2016-17
0.23
actual FR PPG at Providence
Roger McQueen
WHL 2024-25
0.75
actual FR PPG at Providence
Nick Poisson
BCHL 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at Providence
Parker Ford
USHL 2018-19
0.71
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cade Hanley
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Landry Schmuck
Aurora · 2021-22
1.571 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.