IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Sweeney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 7 15 22 0.489 0.1372 0.1332 0.4020 0.3902
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 15 3 4 7 0.467
2016-17 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2015-16 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 25 1 5 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · SUNY Potsdam
+110.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39255
Forward overall
#1572
Forward born in 1994
#161
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dondre Watson
Marian · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Seitz
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marcus Bellomo
Castleton · 2024-25
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.