← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathias Åhman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-06 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 MoDo Hockey U20 SHL-J20 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 MoDo Hockey U20 SHL-J20 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2777 0.2896 0.6656 0.6941
2012-13 MoDo Hockey U20 SHL-J20 40 3 7 10 0.250 0.1388 0.1377 0.3328 0.3302
2013-14 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 30 9 16 25 0.833 0.1062 0.1027 0.2636 0.2549
2014-15 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 44 10 21 31 0.705 0.0898 0.0824 0.2228 0.2045
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SR 27 8 12 20 0.741
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 27 8 12 20 0.741
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 26 11 11 22 0.846
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 18 5 4 9 0.500
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 19 1 2 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stout
+84.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9235
Defenseman overall
#1310
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2023-24
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2006-07
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.