IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Babcock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 42 18 37 55 1.310 0.1917 0.1946 0.6414 0.6509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 NESCAC SR 10 1 1 2 0.200
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 10 1 1 2 0.200
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 24 2 5 7 0.292
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 25 4 3 7 0.280
2015-16 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 23 0 3 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2015-16 · Wesleyan
-21.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6858
Forward overall
#342
Forward born in 1995
#42
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Walinski
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Orem
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Cecka
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.