← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Peterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 31 1 3 4 0.129 0.0143 0.0152 0.0409 0.0435
2012-13 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 38 14 18 32 0.842 0.0931 0.0944 0.2668 0.2704
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Finlandia D3 JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Finlandia D3 SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Finlandia D3 FR 14 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#41185
Forward overall
#1645
Forward born in 1994
#2194
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.