IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicolas Potvin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New England Wolves EHL 20 1 4 5 0.250 0.0578 0.0559 0.1223 0.1182
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 New England College D1 LittleEast SR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2017-18 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2016-17 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 6 0 1 1 0.167
2015-16 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 16 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#49656
Forward overall
#2062
Forward born in 1994
#2332
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Butcher
Wisconsin-Stout · 2016-17
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Martyn
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Moles
Nichols · 2008-09
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.