IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 29 2 7 9 0.310 0.1092 0.1070 0.1521 0.1490
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 35 12 10 22 0.629 0.2212 0.2070 0.3082 0.2884
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast SR 28 13 20 33 1.179
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 28 13 20 33 1.179
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast JR 26 14 15 29 1.115
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 26 14 15 29 1.115
2017-18 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 27 6 12 18 0.667
2016-17 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 25 5 7 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2016-17 · UMass Dartmouth
+235.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32231
Forward overall
#1309
Forward born in 1995
#1101
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Vincent
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Schneider
Stevenson · 2024-25
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.