IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Braga Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.2310 0.2486 0.4893 0.5265
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 30 7 8 15 0.500 0.1155 0.1192 0.2447 0.2526
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2019-20 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 23 9 6 15 0.652
2018-19 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 23 9 6 15 0.652
2017-18 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 17 3 3 6 0.353
2016-17 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 24 8 1 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2016-17 · Southern Maine
+156.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32513
Forward overall
#1385
Forward born in 1996
#1078
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie DiMartino
Framingham State · 2023-24
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Campbell
Marian · 2009-10
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy MacTavish
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.