IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Larocque Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Elite 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 38 14 14 28 0.737 0.1078 0.1082 0.3613 0.3626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 — SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Plymouth State D1 — JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 25 0 9 9 0.360
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 23 6 3 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · Plymouth State
+322.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20001
Forward overall
#791
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Becker
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Victor Tracy
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor McKinney
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.